nibs: <user name="raitoicons" site ="tumblr.com"> (✒ tweeting 'bout me)
The GREAT Kishibe Rohan ([personal profile] nibs) wrote2015-10-31 08:01 pm
Entry tags:

{ruby city | ic inbox}


text . video . voice . action
starmark: (APPROVE ☆ keep your chin up kiddo)

[personal profile] starmark 2015-12-30 10:03 pm (UTC)(link)
If the story called for it I think you would.

[LOOK AT THAT SMOOTH PROTAGONIST DODGE]
starmark: (MUSE ☆ that's a good question pinky)

[personal profile] starmark 2015-12-31 12:35 am (UTC)(link)
Is that your philosophy in real life, too? The clever solution is superior to the physical one.
starmark: (OPTIMIST ☆ it's a big blue watery road)

[personal profile] starmark 2015-12-31 01:10 am (UTC)(link)
Hell if I know what goes into the creative process. It'd be arrogant to pretend like I did, wouldn't it? So I asked.

And no, he has other talents. It's been kind of weird being here and seeing those things more often, since I don't fight a whole lot anymore in comparison.
starmark: (NOSE ☆ not it not it i call not it)

[personal profile] starmark 2015-12-31 02:04 am (UTC)(link)
He's a high-precision Stand. He's surprisingly well-suited for very delicate work. So he can reproduce images of things he sees at a high and precise rate.

He also...I don't know. I guess it's most accurate to say he has a degree of independence. In a battle situation there isn't much room to explore something like that, but I'm learning a lot about the way the relationship works, as far as he's concerned.
starmark: (MUSE ☆ that's a good question pinky)

[personal profile] starmark 2015-12-31 07:42 am (UTC)(link)
He...I guess one way to say it is, he has preferences. Ones that aren't identical to mine.

We let him try eating, as an experiment. He liked that, for example.
starmark: (INSTRUCT ☆ step one: fuck this shit)

[personal profile] starmark 2015-12-31 08:02 am (UTC)(link)
I've seen one that had six individual personalities over six individual parts of the same Stand. They'd bicker among themselves and liked to eat pizza.

Some are just different, I guess.
starmark: (MUSE ☆ that's a good question pinky)

[personal profile] starmark 2016-01-01 12:30 am (UTC)(link)
Mostly encouraging. Why?
starmark: (BEHIND ☆ is he posing in a parked car)

[personal profile] starmark 2016-01-01 02:36 am (UTC)(link)
Can your Stand act on its own without your approval?
starmark: (OPTIMIST ☆ it's a big blue watery road)

[personal profile] starmark 2016-01-01 02:42 am (UTC)(link)
That's what I mean. If I don't "encourage" him to act independently, he'll get confused about what it is I want him to do. Acting independently in combat is different from acting independently in an average situation. Battle is more like independent response.
starmark: (QUIET ☆ my god it's nuanced emoting)

[personal profile] starmark 2016-01-01 03:44 am (UTC)(link)
...No. It was something else.

I'd rather not talk about what led to it. It was personal.
starmark: (SQUINT ☆ that seems fake but okay)

[personal profile] starmark 2016-01-01 05:22 am (UTC)(link)
Does that make you mad?
starmark: (REGRET ☆ no turning back no backing down)

[personal profile] starmark 2016-01-01 05:28 am (UTC)(link)
We're on a first-name basis. It's not an unreasonable assumption that you've got some level of investment in me.

My friends don't usually like it when I'm dodgy.
starmark: (ATTEND ☆ oh hey look there's rohan)

[personal profile] starmark 2016-01-01 05:38 am (UTC)(link)
No. On the contrary, I appreciate it.

I don't know what you used to talk about with the version of me you knew. I don't know if you have expectations I'm not aware of. I won't know unless I ask, so I ask. That's why.

(no subject)

[personal profile] starmark - 2016-01-01 21:56 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] starmark - 2016-01-02 01:05 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] starmark - 2016-01-02 02:15 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] starmark - 2016-01-02 21:59 (UTC) - Expand